India’s RegTech and LegalTech suite. One AI engine behind three platforms — income tax notices and litigation, trademark prosecution and enforcement, and regulatory intelligence across 100+ authorities. The machine reads and drafts; a CA, CS or lawyer signs.
Timings are product reporting on representative matters, not a guarantee for any particular file. The basis for these figures is published.
Then reconciles it against the books, finds the precedent, assembles the annexures and formats the submission. Only the last five percent of that is judgment — and it is the only part a client would knowingly pay a professional rate for.
We built software for the other ninety-five, and left a qualified professional standing at the gate.
Nothing on the left is a bad tool. The cost is not any single stage — it is the seams between them, and the reading that has to happen at every seam.
| Stage of the matter | Typical practice today | On EnterFirst |
|---|---|---|
| Finding out | Someone logs into each portal on a rota, or an email lands in a shared inbox. | Consent-based sync pulls it the day it appears, mapped to client, year and owner. |
| Understanding it | An associate reads the file to work out what is actually being asked. | Parsed to structure — grounds, sections, dates, applicability — in under three minutes. |
| Assembling | Reconciliation in Excel, precedent by keyword search, annexures collated by hand. | Line-by-line reconciliation, precedent by matter shape, annexures built from the evidence vault. |
| Drafting | Last year’s submission, opened and edited. Firm format applied from memory. | Drafted from your templates plus the standard formats, citing the authority it relies on. |
| Checking | Partner review if the calendar allows it. | Maker-checker gate. Nothing files or dispatches without a qualified signature. |
| Proving it later | Email threads, a folder on the server, and whoever still remembers. | Immutable audit trail — every view, version and approval, exportable in full. |
Each product runs standalone and shares the same evidence vault, consent model and audit trail underneath.
India's first income tax litigation management platform — notice to assessment to CIT(A), ITAT and beyond, with drafting, evidence and deadlines in one file.
Smart AI trademark search, advanced monitoring, AI replies to registry objections, opposition handling, prosecution and IP litigation — for brand owners and IP practitioners alike.
Regulatory intelligence across India's regulators — every circular classified by AI and verified by a lawyer, CA or CS within the hour.
Whichever you come through, the engine, the evidence vault and the maker-checker gate are the same underneath. Start where the pain is.
More than a hundred regulators and authorities, with the record complete from 2000 and no gaps. A named few:
Each stage is a record, not a status. The reply cites the authority it relies on, every figure links to the evidence it came from, and the approval that let it leave is timestamped against a named professional.
The journal is screened the week it publishes, similarity is scored against the marks you own, and the grounds are assembled before the four-month window is anywhere near closing.
Every publication is classified against your licences, entities and activities, verified by a qualified professional, and delivered as an obligation with an owner and a date — not as another feed to read.
50+ AI and ML engineers over 1,000+ days building the architecture. 50+ CAs and tax practitioners on TaxEye, 20+ top-tier IP lawyers on Entermark, and 10+ former Income Tax Commissioners on what an assessment question is really asking — the part no corpus contains.
All of it on India’s public tax and IP record — 500,000+ judgments, 75 lakh marks, and every circular since 2000 without a gap. Never on customer documents, which is why "we never train on your data" costs us nothing to promise.
How the engine worksIf yours is not here, ask us directly — we answer within one business day.
EnterFirst builds AI software for regulated work in India. TaxEye handles Income Tax, GST and TDS notices and the litigation that follows; Entermark handles trademark monitoring, objections and oppositions; RegEye tracks 100+ regulators and delivers expert-verified circulars.
No. Every filing, dispatch or submission passes a maker-checker gate where a chartered accountant, company secretary or lawyer reviews and approves.
Each portal pull requires explicit client consent, recorded with a timestamp and fully auditable, designed around the DPDP Act 2023 and DPDP Rules 2025.
Client data for Indian customers is stored and processed in India — AWS Mumbai, backups in AWS Hyderabad — encrypted with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit, with daily encrypted backups retained for 30 days.
No. Your client data is never used to train shared or third-party models. The engine was trained on India’s public tax and IP record, so it has no operational need for your client files.
Yes. Each product runs standalone and shares the same evidence vault, consent model and audit trail, so adding a second requires no data migration.
Tax and revenue bodies including CBDT, CBIC, TRACES and the GST system via a registered GSP API; financial regulators including RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, PFRDA and NHB; corporate and IP bodies including MCA, ROC, NCLT and the Trade Marks Registry; and sectoral bodies including TRAI, FSSAI, BIS, DGFT, MeitY and CERT-In.
For most firms, one to three business days to configure templates, SLA rules and dashboards before go-live.
Yes. Full export of client data, notices, evidence files and audit trails in CSV, Excel or JSON at any time.
Not a slide deck. We take one matter you are actually carrying and show you the draft it produces, the evidence behind every figure, and the professional who has to sign before it leaves.